July, 1817: the “Era of Good Feelings” begins in Boston

July 1817 contains a few updates on the progress of Aunt Scott’s financial affairs. As a reminder, she was in the process of scaling back her estate, the enormous fortune inherited from her first husband having been put into disstress by cronies of her second.

More significantly, Gallison chronicled the famous visit of President James Monroe to Boston, part of an extensive tour of the nation that led to the coining of the “Era of Good Feelings.”  Gallison’s analysis reminds us that, however literally future generations might have taken that phrase, good feelings toward the new president and his supporters were not held by everyone.  Federalists may have been silenced at the national level, but that did not mean they were all inclined to support the new administration.

When the President attended a service at the Federal Street Church as part of his charm offensive, William Ellery Channing’s sermon made clear his disdain for those who sought unnecessary military glory– including the Democratic-Republican sitting before him– and who had helped lead the United States into war against Britain just five years before.  Channing began on the virtue of charity, but quickly pivoted into a very Unitarian/Protestant view of church history.  From there, it was easy to link recent anti-British military fervor to the earlier corruption of the church by Greek and Roman ethics.

Gallison borrowed from this framework to underpin his 1819 address to the Federalist-dominated Massachusetts Peace Society.  In that speech, he not only excoriated those who would mis-use patriotism, but also broadened his argument to reject the “Platonic” (we might today call it Machiavellian or republican) willingness to accept different standards for public and private morality.

While Jefferson, Madison, and their followers may not have adopted a “republican” (with small “r”) philosophy as uncritically as some historians would later maintain, there is no question that Federalists were quite willing to accuse them of doing so.  By raising the specter of classical political philosophy, Federalists were effectively linking Republicans’ policies and attitudes to a lack of Christian virtue, exemplified by Jeffersonians’ sympathy for (revolutionary/atheist) France.

May, 2017

May 1817 Journal Entries

Here we find Daniel Webster’s second appearance in the journals, the first having come in a fleeting mention from an 1812 Phi Beta Kappa gathering at Harvard.

Apart from content, Gallison’s form is worth comment.  He had begun his journals in 1807 as a commonplace-book; even when he expanded their scope to cover more than his education, he made sure that they would be useful for him to read in his old age.  A note in the margin of last month’s entry on April 6 served that mission, by referring to a sermon from some months previous.  This month produces more evidence of his awareness of this volume’s prospective value.  Marginal notes serve as headlines, which make paragraphs easier to skim.  On page 103, we also find an extensive deletion, one of many throughout these volumes.  This one appears not to have much to do with a change of opinion or desire to write more effectively.  Rather, it was likely meant to keep the specifics of private business away from prying eyes in the future.

March, 1817

March 1817 Journal Entries

Some of the topics this month:

William Prescott, Jr., a prominent lawyer who had taken Gallison into his office after the War of 1812 ended.  A Federalist, Prescott was one of the delegates to the Hartford Convention.

Starting on page 62, William Ellery Channing’s view of Holy Communion, of which he (Channing) was a great believer.  Gallison was less able to see the point and recorded his doubts several times throughout the journals.

A literary club formed to support the North American Review and Hale’s newspaper

Reminiscences concerning Major André—the spy captured at West Point during the Revolutionary War—as well as John Jay— Supreme Court justice, diplomat, and co-author of The Federalist Papers.